From: The Pro-Life Infonet
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <[email protected]>
Subject: New Study Shows Abortion Hurts Women's Mental Health
Source: Elliot Institute; August 14, 2002
New Study Shows Abortion Hurts
Women's Mental Health
Springfield, IL -- Six months after her abortion, Jane had a mental
breakdown. When she later delivered a healthy son, unresolved grief over
her abortion contributed to severe post-partum psychosis. "I remember
wanting to throw him out the window of the hospital room," she later told
her therapist.
A study published in the July issue of the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
reveals that both the early and delayed psychiatric episodes experienced by Jane
are significant risks associated with abortion. By examining Medi-Cal
records for 173,000 low-income California women, the research team compared the
rate of psychiatric outpatient treatments for women who had abortions versus
those who carried to term. To control for differences in prior psychological
health, they excluded all women who had any psychiatric care for a year prior to
their pregnancy outcome.
| Abortion was most strongly associated with subsequent treatments for neurotic depression, bipolar disorder, adjustment reactions, and schizophrenic disorders. |
Women were 63 percent more likely to receive mental health care within 90 days
of an abortion compared to delivery. In addition, significantly higher
rates of subsequent mental health treatment persisted over the entire four years
of data examined. Abortion was most strongly associated with subsequent
treatments for neurotic depression, bipolar disorder, adjustment reactions, and
schizophrenic disorders.
Dr. Priscilla Coleman, the study's lead author, said that the study design was
an improvement over previous studies because it relied on medical records rather
than on surveys of women contacted at an abortion clinic.
"Most studies of mental health status after an abortion rely on small
groups of women usually less than 300 and face high drop out rates of 50 percent
or more," said Coleman, a professor at Bowling Green State University in
Ohio. "By looking at medical claims for a large group of women, we
were able to capture a more accurate picture of the differences between abortion
and childbirth."
Another of the study's authors, Dr. David Reardon, said, "Our results are
likely to underestimate the true difference in psychological treatments because
the information on obstetric histories was incomplete. Since
many of the women classified as childbirth only' actually had prior abortions
which we did not know about, this would most likely dilute our findings."
Reardon is the co-author with Dr. Theresa Burke of a new book, "Forbidden
Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion," in which Jane's experience,
summarized above, is included as part of a comprehensive review of post-abortion
reactions. (See www.forbiddengrief.com). "Forbidden Grief" was
recently highlighted as the book of the week selection by radio talk show host
Dr. Laura Schlessinger.
Reardon believes the results these recent studies underscore a key message of
"Forbidden Grief."
"We need to expand outreach and referrals into post-abortion counseling
programs," he said. "There are many women who have great
difficulty coping with the emotional stress following an abortion. Without
help, and especially the understanding of loved ones, they will be more
vulnerable to self-destructive behavior and other psychological disorders."
Public interest in the health effects of abortion was last raised in 1989.
Surgeon General Koop reviewed the research on abortion at the request of
President Reagan. Koop concluded that all the studies done up to that
point was so methodologically flawed that no firm conclusions could be drawn
about abortion's risks or benefits.
In a letter to the outgoing president, Koop recommended that a major federally
funded longitudinal study of abortions health risks was the only way to secure
definitive answers. His proposal for a major study died
in the Democratically controlled congress, however, when abortion advocates
argued that the appeal for such research was politically motivated and a waste
of tax payer dollars.
--
The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and information.
To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to: [email protected].
Infonet is sponsored by Women and Children First (http://www.womenandchildrenfirst.org).
For more pro-life info visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org and for questions or additional information email [email protected]